[b][size=25][center]Public image of brietny[/center]
[/b][/size][size=21]
In March 2007, Leonard Pitts, Jr. wrote that in the aftermath of Spears' personal struggles that have become widely publicized, Spears had been reduced to an abstract idea as opposed to being regarded as a real person.[/size][url=https://algassania2.mam9.com/l%20cite_note-Pitts-171][u][size=21][color:6c1b=#0000ff][172][/u][/color][/size][/url][size=21] "The abstraction is not surprising: Whatever media touch, they objectify... What must it be like to have your marriage and divorce, your relationship with your parents and kids... dissected by millions of strangers who think they know you?"[/size][url=https://algassania2.mam9.com/l%20cite_note-Pitts-171][u][size=21][color:6c1b=#0000ff][172][/u][/color][/size][/url][size=21] Pitts further commented that fame and fortune do not qualify the media scrutiny Spears has faced, but observed that fact has been overlooked by "our rush to a day of [/size][url=https://algassania2.mam9.com/wiki/Reality_television][u][size=21][color:6c1b=#0000ff]'reality' television[/u][/color][/size][/url][size=21]" and "[/size][url=https://algassania2.mam9.com/wiki/Tabloid_journalism][u][size=21][color:6c1b=#0000ff]tabloid journalism[/u][/color][/size][/url][size=21]".[/size][url=https://algassania2.mam9.com/l%20cite_note-Pitts-171][u][size=21][color:6c1b=#0000ff][172][/u][/color][/size][/url][size=21] Though "[t]here is no reverence, no privacy, [and] nothing held back as sacred", Pitts argues "Britney Jean Spears is not an idea."[/size][url=https://algassania2.mam9.com/l%20cite_note-Pitts-171][u][size=21][color:6c1b=#0000ff][172][/u][/color][/size][/url][size=21]
Vanessa Grigoriadis reported in "The Tragedy of Britney Spears" (2008), her cover story for [i]Rolling Stone[/i], that "more than any other star today, Britney epitomizes the crucible of fame for the famous: loving it, hating it and never quite being able to stop it from destroying you."[/size][url=https://algassania2.mam9.com/l%20cite_note-Grigoriadis-172][u][size=21][color:6c1b=#0000ff][173][/u][/color][/size][/url][size=21] Grigoriadis wrote that "every day in L.A., at least a hundred [/size][url=https://algassania2.mam9.com/wiki/Paparazzi][u][size=21][color:6c1b=#0000ff]paparazzi[/u][/color][/size][/url][size=21], reporters and celebrity-magazine editors dash after her" and that paparazzi estimated Spears generated "up to twenty percent of their coverage for the past year."[/size][url=https://algassania2.mam9.com/l%20cite_note-Grigoriadis-172][u][size=21][color:6c1b=#0000ff][173][/u][/color][/size][/url][size=21] She further documented that in addition to tabloid journalists, the [/size][url=https://algassania2.mam9.com/wiki/Associated_Press][u][size=21][color:6c1b=#0000ff]Associated Press[/u][/color][/size][/url][size=21] declared that everything Spears does is considered news.[/size][url=https://algassania2.mam9.com/l%20cite_note-Grigoriadis-172][u][size=21][color:6c1b=#0000ff][173][/u][/color][/size][/url][size=21] "The paparazzi feed the celebrity magazines, which feed the mainstream press, while sources sell their dirtiest material to [/size][url=https://algassania2.mam9.com/wiki/British_tabloid_press][u][size=21][color:6c1b=#0000ff]British tabloids[/u][/color][/size][/url][size=21], and then it trickles back to America," wrote Grigoriadis. "She's the [/size][url=https://algassania2.mam9.com/wiki/Canary][u][size=21][color:6c1b=#0000ff]canary[/u][/color][/size][/url][size=21] in the [/size][url=https://algassania2.mam9.com/wiki/Coal_mine][u][size=21][color:6c1b=#0000ff]coal mine[/u][/color][/size][/url][size=21] of our culture, the most vivid representation of the excess of the past [/size]decade."[url=https://algassania2.mam9.com/l%20cite_note-Grigoriadis-172][u][color:6c1b=#0000ff][173][/u][/color][/url][size=29]
H.A[/size]