[b][url=http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/19/2012-planet-x-is-not-nibiru/]2012: Planet X is not Nibiru[/url][/b]
Written by [url=http://www.universetoday.com/author/ian/]Ian O'Neill[/url]
[url=http://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/doomsday_kbo2.jpg][img(234px,250px)]
http://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/doomsday_kbo2-234x250.jpg[/img][/url][url=http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/the-solar-system/]The Solar System[/url]’s
outer reaches still contain many minor planets yet to be discovered.
Ever since the search for Planet X began in the early 20th Century, the
possibility of a hypothetical planet orbiting [url=http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/the-sun/]the Sun[/url]
beyond the Kuiper Belt has fuelled many Doomsday theories and
speculation that Planet X is actually the Sun’s long lost binary
sibling. But why the fear about the Planet X/Doomsday combination?
Surely Planet X is just an unknown, hypothetical object and nothing
sinister?
[b]Related 2012 articles:[/b]
[list]
[*][b][url=http://www.universetoday.com/2008/10/03/2012-no-geomagnetic-reversal/]2012: No Geomagnetic Reversal[/url][/b][url=http://www.universetoday.com/2008/10/03/2012-no-geomagnetic-reversal/] (posted October 3rd 2008)[/url]
[*][url=http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/21/2012-no-killer-solar-flare/][b]2012: No Killer Solar Flare[/b] (posted June 21st 2008)[/url]
[*][url=http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/19/2012-planet-x-is-not-nibiru/][b]2012: Planet X Is Not Nibiru[/b] (posted June 19th 2008)[/url]
[*][url=http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/25/2012-no-planet-x/][b]2012: No Planet X[/b] (posted May 25th 2008)[/url]
[*][url=http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/19/no-doomsday-in-2012/][b]No Doomsday in 2012[/b] (posted May 19th 2008)[/url]
[/list]
As I’ve previously discussed in “[url=http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/25/2012-no-planet-x/]2012: No Planet X[/url]“, doomsayers have linked the modern day search for Planet X, the ancient [url=http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/19/no-doomsday-in-2012/]Mayan 2012 Prophecy[/url]
and the Sumerian mythical planet Nibiru, culminating in bad news for
December 21st 2012. However, the astronomical evidence for these links
is seriously flawed.
Yesterday (Wednesday, June 18th), Japanese researchers announced news that their theoretical search for a large mass in the [url=http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/the-solar-system/other-solar-system/]outer Solar System[/url]
has produced results. From their calculations, there might just be a
planet, possibly a bit bigger than a Plutoid but certainly smaller than
[url=http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/earth/]Earth[/url] orbiting beyond 100 AU from the Sun. But before we get carried away, this is [i]not[/i] Nibiru, this is [i]not[/i]
proof of the end of the world in 2012; it is a new and very exciting
development in the search for minor planets beyond the Kuiper Belt…
In a new theoretical simulation, two researchers have deduced that the outermost reaches of the Solar System [url=http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080618-planet-x.html]may contain an undiscovered planet[/url]. Patryk Lykawka and Tadashi Mukai of Kobe University have published a paper in the [i]Astrophysical Journal[/i] detailing a minor planet that they believe may be interacting with the mysterious Kuiper Belt.
[b]Kuiper Belt Objects (KBOs)[/b]
[url=http://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/sedna-art.jpg][img(250px,187px)]
http://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/sedna-art-250x187.jpg[/img][/url]The Kuiper Belt occupies a huge region of space, approximately 30-50
AU from the Sun. It contains a vast number of rocky and metallic
objects, the largest known body being the [url=http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/pluto/dwarf-planet-pluto/]dwarf planet[/url] ([url=http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/11/iau-throws-pluto-a-bone-plutoids/]or “Plutoid”[/url])
Eris. It has been known for many years that the Kuiper Belt has a few
strange characteristics that may signal the presence of another large
planetary body orbiting the Sun beyond the Kuiper Belt. One such
feature is the aptly named “Kuiper Cliff” that occurs at 50 AU. This is
an abrupt end to the Kuiper Belt, very few Kuiper Belt objects (or
KBOs) have been observed beyond this point. This cliff cannot be
attributed to orbital resonances with massive planets such as [url=http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/neptune/]Neptune[/url],
and there doesn’t appear to be any obvious observational error. Many
astronomers believe that such a sharp cut-off in KBO population may be
due to an as-yet to be discovered planet, possibly as large as Earth.
This is an object Lykawka and Mukai believe they have calculated to
exist.
[url=http://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/eighttnos.png][img(250px,181px)]
http://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/eighttnos-250x181.png[/img][/url]This research predicts a large object, 30-70% the mass of the Earth,
orbiting at a distance of around 100-200 AU from the Sun. This object
may also help explain why some KBOs and tran-Neptunian objects (TNOs)
have some strange orbital characteristics (such as Sedna).
Ever since [url=http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/pluto/]Pluto[/url]
was discovered in 1930, astronomers have been looking for another more
massive body that could explain the orbital perturbations observed in
the orbits of [url=http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/neptune/uranus-and-neptune/]Neptune and Uranus[/url].
This search became known as the “search for Planet X”, which literally
meant the “search for an as yet unidentified planet.” In the 1980’s
these perturbations were put down to observational error. Therefore,
the modern-day scientific search for Planet X is the search for a large
KBO or a minor planet beyond. Although Planet X may not be larger than
the mass of the Earth, researchers are still very excited about finding
more KBOs, possibly the size of a Plutoid, possibly a little bigger,
but not much bigger.
<blockquote>“[i]The interesting thing for me is the suggestion of
the kinds of very interesting objects that may yet await discovery in
the outer solar system. We are still scratching the edges of that
region of the solar system, and I expect many surprises await us with
the future deeper surveys.[/i]” - Mark Sykes, Director of the Planetary Science Institute in Arizona.</blockquote>
[b]Planet X is not scary[/b]
[url=http://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/nibiru2.jpg][img(250px,170px)]
http://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/nibiru2-250x170.jpg[/img][/url]So where does Nibiru come in? Back in 1976 a controversial book called
“The Twelfth Planet” was written by Zecharia Sitchin. Sitchin had
interpreted some ancient Sumerian cuneiform texts (the earliest known
form of writing) as a literal translation of the origin of humankind.
These 6000 year old texts apparently reveal that an alien race known as
the Anunnaki travelled to Earth on a planet called Nibiru. It’s a long
and involved story, but in a nutshell, the Anunnaki genetically
modified primates on Earth to create [i]homo sapiens[/i] to be their slaves. (I just worked out where the storyline for Kurt Russell’s 1994 movie [i]Stargate[/i] probably came from…)
When the Anunnaki left Earth, they let us rule the planet until they
return. All this may seem a little fantastical, and perhaps a little
too detailed when considering it is a literal translation from 6000
year old texts. Sitchin’s work has been disregarded by the scientific
community as many of his methods of interpretation are considered
imaginative at best. Nevertheless, many people have taken Sitchin’s
work literally, and believe Nibiru (in its highly eccentric orbit
around the Sun) will be returning, possibly as soon as 2012 to cause
all sorts of terror and destruction here on Earth. It is important to
note here that I am not calling into question any archaeological,
spiritual or historic evidence for Nibiru, I am simply pointing out the
link between the 2012 Doomsday Planet X theory is based on very dubious
astronomical “discoveries”; if this is the case, how can Planet X be
considered to be the embodiment of Nibiru?
Then there’s the IRAS “discovery of a [url=http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/stars/brown-dwarf/]brown dwarf[/url]
in the outer Solar System” in 1984 and the “NASA announcement of a 4-8
Earth mass planet travelling toward Earth” in 1993. Doomsayers (often
with a book to sell) cling on to these astronomical discoveries as
proof that Nibiru is in fact the Planet X astronomers have been
searching for over the last century. Not only that, by manipulating the
facts about these scientific studies, they “prove” that Nibiru is
travelling toward us, and by 2012, this massive body will pass through
the [url=http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/the-solar-system/inner-solar-system/]inner Solar System[/url], causing all sorts of gravitational damage. For more information on this topic, see “[url=http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/25/2012-no-planet-x/]2012: No Planet X[/url].”
In its purest form, Planet X is an unknown, theoretically possible
planet orbiting peacefully beyond the Kuiper Belt. If yesterday’s
announcement does lead to the observation of a planet or Plutoid, it
will be an incredible discovery that will help to shed some light on
the evolution and characteristics of the mysterious outer reaches of
the Solar System.
But as I write, I can guarantee that doomsayers are adapting this
new research to be used as support for their nonsensical theories that
Planet X is in fact Nibiru, and it’s coming in our direction by 2012.
Why do I get the feeling we’ll still be here in the year 2013?
Home 
Calendar
